This Performance Audit Report has been prepared for submission to the
President of India under Article 151 of the Constitution.
The Report is a Performance Audit of civil aviation sector in India which
includes NACIL (Air India Limited as it is known today), the Ministry of Civil
Aviation (MoCA) and the Bilateral Agreements concluded by Government of
India with other governments on entitlements for international operations
between India and their countries, as well as permissions given to private
Indian carriers to operate on international routes. The Performance Audit
was commenced in September 2009 and would have concluded in 2010, but
for the fact that reasons for non-performance/losses incurred by Air India
Limited were inconclusive without examining the role and extent of
support/control by MoCA. Air India repeatedly stated that the government's
decision to award profitable routes to private Indian carriers and
international carriers vide bilateral agreements also adversely impacted
their commercial viability. Hence, to ensure a holistic study, we had to
examine the open sky policy of the government which also included bilateral
agreements with other countries. This examination was carried out in late
2010 and early 2011.
At each stage of the audit process, our findings have been shared with
AIL and MoCA. The first draft of the performance audit was issued to the
Ministry in November 2010 and a second draft report in March 2011. The final
draft incorporating the results of the audit of bilateral agreements was
issued to the MoCA in July 2011. The replies received from the AIL and
Ministry have been incorporated in the Report. Deliberations held in the exit
rd conference on 3 August 2011 have also been addressed adequately.
Audit wishes to acknowledge the cooperation received from IAL, AIL and
the MoCA at each stage of the audit process.
What does our performance audit cover? (Link)
We took up the performance audit to ascertain:
Whether the acquisition of aircraft by the erstwhile Air India Ltd. (AIL) and Indian
Airlines Ltd. (IAL) was appropriately planned and effectively implemented, with due
regard to economy, efficiency and accepted norms of financial propriety;
Whether the merger of AIL and IAL into NACIL was properly planned and effectively
implemented, and the effectiveness of merged operations of the two entities;
the impact of the liberalised policy of the Government of India (GoI) from 2004-05
onwards on grant of air traffic rights to other countries through Air Services
Agreements (ASAs)/ “bilateral” agreements, and permitting Indian private carriers to
fly on international routes;
The main reasons for the poor financial and operational performance of the premerger airlines and the merged entity; and
Whether the Ministry of Civil Aviation (MoCA) exercised its oversight role adequately
and effectively.
No comments:
Post a Comment